Monday, April 02, 2012
Malaysian companies told to seek rubber plantation land in Cambodia ... due to no restrictions on the employment of expatriates
Monday April 2, 2012
By HANIM ADNAN
nem@thestar.com.my
Ramesh also suggested Cambodia for rubber expansion given the Cambodian government's attractive investment incentives.
This include tax holiday of up to eight years from the first year of profit, repatration of dividends or profits are free from any taxes, profits re-invested are exempted from all corporate taxes and no restrictions on the employment of expatriates.
Plantation companies need to look overseas in order to
revitalise industry
PETALING JAYA: The revival of
rubber as a major commercial crop for Malaysia can be a success should
local plantation companies adopt strategies such as land expansion
overseas.
This is apart from acquiring
local brownfield and greenfield areas, as well as converting current
marginal oil palm land to rubber, said Tradewinds Plantation Bhd head of
plantation advisory Ramesh Veloo.
For ventures abroad, he said
local players should look at Liberia, Gabon, Cameroon, Indonesia,
Cambodia and Latin America.
“These countries have optimum
plantation base such as ample contiguous and sizeable land, suitable
agro climatic conditions and sufficient labour,” Ramesh added.
Other countries with the right
climate and labour supply for rubber also include India, China, Cote
d'Ivoire and Vietnam.
Malaysia should look to
establish rubber estates in countries like Liberia, Gabon, Cameroon,
Indonesia, and Cambodia .
According to Ramesh, land
expansion overseas and looking into unexplored opportunities appeared to
be a solution to revive the rubber sector in Malaysia and also the
consideration of a blue ocean strategy by local players. He cited
Indonesia as an option for Malaysian planters seeking rubber expansion.
It was reported that there are
seven million to 14 million hectares (ha) of degraded land comprising
degraded forest, marginal/waste land, idle/unused land in Kalimantan,
Sulawesi, Sumatra, Java, Nusa Tenggara and Papua.
“The nature of rubber as a
forest crop also facilitates the potential of the crop for
reforestation,” he added.
Ramesh also suggested Cambodia for rubber
expansion given the Cambodian government's attractive investment
incentives.
This include tax holiday of up to eight
years from the first year of profit, repatration of dividends or profits
are free from any taxes, profits re-invested are exempted from all
corporate taxes and no restrictions on the employment of expatriates.
Africa too hold potential for
rubber expansion, said Ramesh. McKinsey Global Institute in 2010 had
projected that Africa will see a collective GDP of US$2.6 trillion with
US$1.4 trillion in consumer spending by 2020. In addition, there will be
1.1 billion Africans at working age by 2040. Ramesh warned local
planters that issues related to rubber investments outside Malaysia
would need to be further explored and mitigated to achieve greater
success.
Country risk for overseas
investment should be carefully weighed prior to making any decision. An
investor may choose to pay a higher price and purchase established
plantations which can generate immediate income rather than take a risk
on political stability during the gestation period for a greenfield
development which takes five to seven years.
Other issues include land claims
or overlapping claims, land encroachment, sustainability, getting the
wrong partners, currency risks, logistics and change of government or
civil war.
On the local front, Ramesh said
the biggest challenge in reviving rubber as a commercial crop would be
labour and attracting skill and professional planters.
The government is also playing
an active role in reviving rubber through the replanting and new
planting program under the Rubber National Key Economic Area. A total of
40,000ha will be replanted and 30,000ha of new land developed in the
next five years.
Risda, Sabah Rubber Industry
Board and Sarawak Agriculture Department are the agencies involved in
the revival programme. The target of the programme is to have 1.2
million ha planted with rubber trees that could achieve a national
average yield at 2,000kg per ha per year by 2020.
As for private investors, there
is limited potential in Malaysia for reviving rubber in both brown and
greenfield development. Some recent developments were observed in
Kelantan, Sabah and Sarawak with the good prices of rubber.
However, it would be
economically viable to develop marginal land and converting existing oil
palm land into rubber, added Ramesh.
For expansion within Malaysia,
he said the land cost for brownfield was higher from RM40,000 to
RM70,000 per hectare versus the greenfield ranging from RM24,000 to
RM40,000 per hectare.
The replanting or cost to
maturing for brownfield was about RM10,000 to RM12,000 per planted
hectare while greenfield estimated at RM13,000 to RM15,000.
According to Ramesh, most of the
brownfield areas for sale in Malaysia have more than 60% to 70% of
trees aged above 15 years with poor bark reserves. “The internal rates
of return (IRR) for brownfield is higher than greenfield mainly due to
the revenue generated immediately after the land acquisition while the
gestation period for greenfield is between six and seven years,” said
Ramesh.
As for the conversion of oil
palm land to rubber, he said the IRR for oil palm on marginal area was
from 8% to 12% compared with rubber on marginal area at higher IRR of
12% to 14%. Oil palm EBITDA margin, when planted in a marginal area is
RM3,800 to RM7,300 per hectare versus the EBITDA oil palm planted on
non-marginal land at RM6,000 to RM10,000 per hectare.
The EBITDA of rubber (planted on
palm oil marginal land) is higher at about RM4,200 to RM7,500 per
hectare.
No comments:
Post a Comment